ICMCC

the international council on medical & care compunetics

news page

11
February, 2012
Saturday

A Randomized Trial Comparing Telemedicine Case Management with Usual Care in Older, Ethnically Diverse, Medically Underserved Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: 5 Year Results of the IDEATel Study

Context:
Telemedicine is a promising but largely unproven technology for providing case management services to patients with chronic conditions and lower access to care.

Objectives:
To examine the effectiveness of a telemedicine intervention to achieve clinical management goals in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes.

Design, Setting, and Patients:
A randomized controlled trial was conducted, comparing telemedicine case management to usual care, with blinded outcome evaluation, in 1,665 Medicare recipients with diabetes, aged ≥ 55 years, residing in federally designated medically underserved areas of New York State.

Interventions:
Home telemedicine unit with nurse case management versus usual care.

Main Outcome Measures:
The primary endpoints assessed over 5 years of follow-up were hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c), low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and blood pressure levels.

Results:
Intention-to-treat mixed models showed that telemedicine achieved net overall reductions over five years of follow-up in the primary endpoints (HgbA1c, p = 0.001; LDL, p < 0.001; systolic and diastolic blood pressure, p = 0.024; p < 0.001). Estimated differences (95% CI) in year 5 were 0.29 (0.12, 0.46)% for HgbA1c, 3.84 (-0.08, 7.77) mg/dL for LDL cholesterol, and 4.32 (1.93, 6.72) mm Hg for systolic and 2.64 (1.53, 3.74) mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure. There were 176 deaths in the intervention group and 169 in the usual care group (hazard ratio 1.01 [0.82, 1.24]).

Conclusions:
Telemedicine case management resulted in net improvements in HgbA1c, LDL-cholesterol and blood pressure levels over 5 years in medically underserved Medicare beneficiaries. Mortality was not different between the groups, although power was limited.

Full article
Shea, Steven; Weinstock, Ruth S.; Teresi, Jeanne A.; Palmas, Walter; Starren, Justin; Cimino, James J.; Lai, Albert M.; Field, Lesley; Morin, Philip C.; Goland, Robin; Izquierdo, Roberto E.; Ebner, Susana; Silver, Stephanie; Petkova, Eva; Kong, Jian; Eimicke, Joseph P., J Am Med Inform Assoc, 16(4), 446-456, DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M3157

More bibliographic information.

5 July 2009 | Categories: Science | Country: United States | Tag(s): Diabetes, Effectiveness, Telemedicine, trials
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
If you appreciate our news pages, don't forget to subscribe or try the NEW ICMCC toolbar!

2 Comments

  1. Will this trial be continued? How did you know that telemedicine resulted in the differences? For instance, some patients may have obtained a trainer or nutritionist. I am trying to use telemedicine as a topic in a dissertation in information science.

  2. Lodewijk says:

    I couldn’t answer your question. But there is an email link on the abstract page

Leave a Reply

Back to News Page

subscribe

ICMCC is member of

IFMBE

WABT

© ICMCC 2004-2011

Log in